Comparisons with a “color” component as a means of human assessment (based on the Tatar and Russian languages)
https://doi.org/10.26907/2311-2042-2021-17-2-25-44
Abstract
This article examines comparative constructions with a color component in the Tatar and Russian languages in a comparative aspect.
The purpose of this research is to study comparisons with color components as a means of describing a person’s appearance and character. Examples from the Written Corpus of the Tatar Language, the National Corpus of the Russian Language were used as research materials. Color component comparisons are used to describe natural features of people’s appearance and external signs of their physical and psychological state. These figurative means can create either a positive or a negative image, depending on the compared object and image.
The theoretical and practical value of this work is the possibility of using its main results in studying linguoculture and lexicology of the Tatar and Russian languages.
About the Authors
R. M. Bolgarova
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bolgarova Ramziya – Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor in the Department of General Linguistics and Turkology, the Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication
18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008
R. S. Nurmukhametova
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nurmukhametova Raushaniya – Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor in the Department of General Linguistics and Turkology, the Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication
18 Kremlyovskaya Str., Kazan, 420008
References
1. Gumbol'dt, W. (1985). Iazyk i filosofiia kul'tury [Language and Philosophy of Culture]. 450 p. Moscow, Progress. (In Russian)
2. Maslova, V. A. (2007). Homolingualis v kul'ture: Monografiia [Homolingualis in Culture: A Monograph]. 320 p. Moscow, Gnozis. (In Russian)
3. Natsional'nyi korpus russkogo iazyka [Russian National Corpus]. URL: https://ruscorpora.ru/new (accessed: 26.08.2021). (In Russian)
4. Potebnia, A. A. (1993). Mysl' i iazyk [Thought and Language]. 302 p. Kiev, SINTO. (In Russian)
5. Ramazanova, D. B. (2013). Leksika na tatarskom iazyke, otnosiashchaiasia k cheloveku [Tatar Vocabulary Related to a Person]. P. 364. Kazan', izdatel'stvo IYALI. (In Russian)
6. Tatar teleneң yazma korpusy [Corpus of Written Tatar]. URL: https://www.corpus.tatar (accessed: 26.08.2021). (In Russian)
7. Tolkovyi slovar' tatarskogo iazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of the Tatar Language]. URL: http://suzlek.antat.ru (accessed: 26.08.2021). (In Tatar)
8. Tolkovyi slovar' tatarskogo iazyka (2005) [Explanatory Dictionary of the Tatar Language]. P. 848. Kazan', Dom pechati. (In Russian)
9. Tolkovyi slovar' Ozhegova [Ozhegov's Explanatory Dictionary]. URL: https://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/ogegova/ (accessed: 26.08.2021). (In Russian)
10. Zamaletdinov, R. R. (2004). Tatarskaia kul'tura v iazykovom otrazhenii [Tatar Culture in Linguistic Reflection]. Moscow, Gumanit. izdat. tsentr VLADOS; 239 p. Kazan', Magarif. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Bolgarova R.M., Nurmukhametova R.S. Comparisons with a “color” component as a means of human assessment (based on the Tatar and Russian languages). Tatarica. 2021;17(2):25-44. https://doi.org/10.26907/2311-2042-2021-17-2-25-44
Views:
119
Email this article 