Preview

Tatarica

Advanced search

Pragmatic communication functions of greetings in Tatar and Uzbek linguocultures

https://doi.org/10.26907/2311-2042-2024-23-2-7-24

Abstract

The issues of speech etiquette and specific speech expressions frequently become the focus of linguists’ attention, as speech etiquette is an integral part of communicative culture. Studying this phenomenon aids in revealing the communication features characterizing representatives of different nationalities and enables us to understand their mindsets. Furthermore, speech etiquette should be addressed when discussing matters related to the establishment and adherence to linguistic norms.

This research focuses on the closely related Turkic languages ~ Tatar and Uzbek. Despite considerable similarities in vocabulary and grammar between these languages, differences exist in the usage of greeting expressions.

Linguistic research emphasizes the sociolinguistic and methodological approach to evaluating speech etiquette: it identifies key speech expressions, associated with typical communication situations, and reveals their equivalents in other languages. In both Tatar and Uzbek cultures, the fundamental rules of greeting are largely similar. In this case, interrogative phrases are actively employed.
Upon meeting, individuals frequently inquire about each other’s health and daily life, using the phrases “Hcanex, cayavixuei?” (“How is your health?”), “Hcau-cay eoma itopucezme?” (“Are you alive and well?") and the like. People greet one another in various forms and manners, wishing each other good morning, good day, suecess in work, health and well-being. Notably, in Tatar and Uzbek linguocultures, it is customary to inquire not only about the addressee’s health but also about the health and well-being of their relatives and close ones, along with invitations to come and see them

About the Authors

F. R. Sibgaeva
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation

Sibgaeva, Firuza – Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor in the Department of General Linguistics and Turkology, the Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Senior Researcher in the SRNLaC Research Group

 18 Kremloyskaya Str., Kazan, 420008



G. I. Toirova
Bukhara State University
Uzbekistan

Toirova, Guli – Doctor of Philology, Professor in the Department of Uzbek Linguistics and Journalism

11 M. Ikbol Str., Bukhara, 200114



References

1. Shәikhieva, G. M. (2002). Sүz'yasalyshy һәm sөilәm әdәbe [Word Formation and Speech Culture]. Problemy slovoobrazovaniya v tyurkskikh yazykakh. Pp. 319–323. Kazan, Fikir. (In Russian)

2. Safiullina, F. S., Fatkhullova, K. S. (1999). Tatarskii rechevoi ehtiket [Tatar Speech Etiquette]. Tatarskii yazyk: Intensivnyi kurs. 37 p. Kazan', Khәter. (In Russian, in Tatar)

3. Lingvisticheskii ehntsiklopedicheskii slovar' Yartsova. (1990) [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Gl. red. V. N. 413 p. Moscow, Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya. (In Russian)

4. Formanovskaya, N. I. (1997). Rechevoi ehtiket i kul'tura obshcheniya [Speech Etiquette and Communi cation Culture]. 128 p. Moscow, Russkii yazyk. (In Russian)

5. Abdullin, A. A. (2006). Ehticheskie vyrazheniya v sovremennom tatarskom literaturnom yazyke: dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Ethical Expressions in Modern Tatar Literary Language: Ph.D. Thesis]. Kazan, 200 p. (In Russian)

6. Muminova, A. A. (2015). Uzbekskii rechevoi ehtiket: sen (ty), siz (vy, vy) [Uzbek Speech Etiquette: Sen (You), Siz (You)]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika. No. 3, pp. 34–40. (In Russian)

7. Mirtozhiev, M., Maҳmudov, N. (1992). Til va madaniyat [Language and Culture]. 128 p. Toshkent, Ўzbekiston. (In Uzbek)

8. Ҳozhieva, Ҳ. Ya. (2001). Ўzbek tilida ҳurmat maidoni va uning lisonii-nutқii khususiyati: Filol. fan. nomz. … diss. [The Field of Respect in the Uzbek Lan guage and Its Linguistic-Speech Characteristics: Ph.D. Thesis]. Samarkand, 168 p. (In Uzbek)

9. “Nisa (Khatynnar)” sүrәse, 86 nchy ayat'” [“Women”, Verse 86]. URL: http://dumrt.ru/articles/mm-islam/mm-islam_5141.html. (In Uzbek)

10. https://tt.wikipedia.org/wiki

11. https://abishevaalena.ru/?page_id=488

12. Nasyiri, K. (1992). Kitab-әt-tәrbiya [A Book about Education]. 144 p. Kazan, Tatar. kit. nәshr. (In Tatar)

13. Mәkhmүtov, M. I., Khәmzin, K. Z., Sәifullin, G. Sh. (1993). Garәpchә-tatarcha-ruscha alynmalar sүzlege (tatar әdәbiyatynda kullanylgan garәp һәm farsy sүzlәre) 2 t. [Dictionary of Arabic-Tatar-Russian Borrowings. (Arabic and Persian Words Used in Tatar Literature)]. 786 p. Kazan, Iman. (In Tatar)

14. Bigiev, Z. (1991). Zur gөnaһlar [Great Sins]. 228 p. Kazan, Tat. kit. nәshr. (In Tatar)

15. Әkhmәt'yanov, R. R. (2001). Tatar teleneң kyskacha tarikhi-ehtimologik sүzlege [A Brief Histori cal-Etymological Dictionary of the Tatar Language]. 272 p. Kazan: Tatar. kit. nәshr. (In Tatar)

16. Toirova, G. I. (2009). Nutқii muloқotning pragmatik taҳlilida sistema tushunchasi [The Concept of System in the Pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Commu nication]. Filologiya masalalari. No. 1, pp. 26–31. Toshkent, ЎZDZHTI. (In Uzbek)


Review

For citations:


Sibgaeva F.R., Toirova G. Pragmatic communication functions of greetings in Tatar and Uzbek linguocultures. Tatarica. 2024;23(2):7-24. https://doi.org/10.26907/2311-2042-2024-23-2-7-24

Views: 83


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-2042 (Print)