Aspects of studying root bases in the Turkic languages.
https://doi.org/10.26907/2311-2042-2022-19-2-7-23
Abstract
This article provides an overview of various trends in Turkic linguistics related to the study of root bases. The paper examines the views of well-known Turkologists on the structure of root bases, morphological features and semantic features. Primary roots, as the simplest, smallest and at the same time important units, constitute a very ancient layer, like the linguistic phenomenon itself. Today, their collection and systematization is one of the urgent tasks of studying the history of the language. The theoretical and practical significance of this research is determined by the possibility of using its main results in comparative-historical and etymological studies, in developing the theory of the root in the Turkic and Altaic languages.
About the Authors
N. U. Khaliullina
Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmulla
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor in the Department of the Tatar Language and Literature
3 a October Revolution Str., Ufa, 450000
I. S. Nasipov
Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmulla
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of the Tatar Language and Literature
3 a October Revolution Str., Ufa, 450000
References
1. Timirkhanov, V. R. (2007). Imyaslavie i lingvistika kornya [Imyaslavie and Root Linguistics]. 248 p. Moscow, MAKS Press. (In Russian)
2. Yunusaliev, B. M. (1953). Razvitie kornevykh slov v kirgizskom yazyke: diss. dokt. filol. nauk [Development of Root Words in the Kyrgyz Language: Doctoral Thesis Abstract]. 38 p. Moscow. (In Russian)
3. Baskakov, N. A. (1988). Istorikotipologicheskaya fonologiya tyurkskikh yazykov [Historical and Typological Phonology of Turkic Languages]. 207 p. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
4. Shaikhulov, A. G. (2000). Struktura i ideograficheskaya paradigmatika odnoslozhnykh kornevykh osnov v kypchakskikh yazykakh UraloPovolzh'ya v kontinuume areal'noy, mezhtyurkskoy i obshchetyurkskoy leksiki [The Structure and Ideographic Paradigmatics of Monosyllabic Root Stems in the Kypchak Languages of the Ural-Volga Region in the Continuum of Areal, Inter-Turkic and Common Turkic Vocabulary]. 490 p. Ufa, RiO BashGU. (In Russian)
5. Drevnetyurkskii slovar' (1969) [Ancient Turkic Dictionary]. 677 p. Leningrad, Nauka. (In Russian)
6. Zaionchkovskii, A. K. (1961). K voprosu o strukture kornya v tyurkskikh yazykakh: Glagol'nyye osnovy monosillabicheskogo (odnoslozhnogo) tipa S+G (soglasnyy+glasnyy) [On the Issue of the Root Structure in the Turkic Languages: Verbal Stems of the Monosyllabic (Monosyllabic) Type С+V (consonant+vowel)]. VYA. No. 2. Р. 28-35 (In Russian)
7. Kaidarov, A. T. (1986).Struktura odnoslozhnykh korney i osnov v kazakhskom yazyke [The Structure of Monosyllabic Roots and Stems in the Kazakh Language]. 328 p. Alma-Ata, Nauka. (In Russian)
8. Alparov, G. Kh. (1945). Izbrannyye Trudy [Selected Works]. 145 p. Kazan'. (In Russian)
9. Khangildin, V. N. (1954). Grammatika tatarskogo yazyka: ocherki o morfologii [Grammar of the Tatar Language: Essays on Morphology]. 335 p. Kazan', Tatknigoizdat. (In Russian)
10. Kormushin, I. V. (1971). Leksikosemanticheskoye razvitiye kornya *qa v altayskikh yazykakh [Lexico-Semantic Development of the Root *qa in the Altaic Languages]. Tyurkskaya leksikologiya i leksikografiya. р. 11-13. Moscow, Nauka. (In Russian)
11. Kazhibekov, Ye. Z. (1985). Glagol'noimennaya korrelyatsiya gomogennykh korney v tyurkskikh yazykakh (yavleniye sinkretizma) [VerbNominal Correlation of Homogeneous Roots in Turkic Languages (phenomenon of syncretism)]. 272 p. AlmaAta, Nauka. (In Russian)
12. Akhmat'yanov, R. G. (2003). Istoricheskiye istochniki tatarskikh terinologii [Historical Sources of Tatar Terinologies]. 174 p. Kazan', Tatar. knizh. izd. (In Russian)
13. Khaliullina, N. U., Shaykhulov, A. G. (2004). Tyurkskiye yazyki Uralo-Povolzh'ya v kontekste altayskogo yazykovogo soobshchestva (opyt leksikosemanticheskogo i ideograficheskogo slovarya): slovar' [Turkic Languages of the Ural-Itil Region in the Context of the Altaic Language Community (Experience of Lexico-Semantic and Ideographic Dictionary): A Dictionary]. Ch. I, 226 p. Ch. II, 272 p. Ufa, Vostochnyi un-t. (In Russian)
14. Nasipov, I. S. (2009). Opyt sistematizatsii finno-ugorskikh zaimstvovaniy v tatarskom yazyke [Experience of Systematization of Finno-Ugric Borrowings in the Tatar Language]. 233 p. Kazan', IYALI. (In Russian)
15. Pyataeva, N. V. (2006). Antropotsentricheskiy i sistemotsentricheskiy printsipy lingvistiki v dinamicheskom issledovanii leksicheskikh gnezd [Anthropocentric and System-Centric Principles of Linguistics in the Dynamic Study of Lexical Nests]. 280 p. Ufa, Gilem. (In Russian)
16. Khaliullina, N. U. (2016). Semanticheskaya rekonstruktsiya kornevykh osnov v etimologicheskom gnezde (na materiale yazykov altaiskoi sem'i) [Semantic Reconstruction of the Root Bases in the Etymological Nest (based on the languages of the Altai family)].
Review
For citations:
Khaliullina N.U., Nasipov I.S. Aspects of studying root bases in the Turkic languages. Tatarica. 2022;19(2):7-13. https://doi.org/10.26907/2311-2042-2022-19-2-7-23
Views:
157
Email this article 